Immediately after the Charlemont Church Music Workshop I received a letter from one of the participants, a young woman whom I have known for several years. She responded immediately, with her whole heart and mind - and her questions were just right - they arose from the quick skimming-over we had to do in limited time, and posed topics that we can spend the rest of our lives poring over. I'll share it with you.
Dear Alice:
Thank you. You told me things I knew and didn't know in ways that have renewed me. The thunder of "Foundation" still rings in my heart*. . . Thank you for saying we as church musicians have a need, a commission if you will, to share the messages of God with those around us through music. So often the world shouts me down. Thanks for "shouting back", along with all those I met this last weekend. It was truly an oasis to me. The thunder of "Foundation" still rings in my heart*. . .
* We had sung 'How Firm a Foundation' very slowly and thoughtfully as a round: unison first verse, two-part 2nd, etc. 5th verse repeating the four-part canon very quietly. It is a martyr hymn, and does pack an enormous punch both in words and music when it's not rushed through.
Some topics for consideration . . .
1) How do you sort through the many catalogs, tapes, CD's and scores we get from the various music companies to find "the jewels"? Is the process the same as for hymns? (good words, good musical melody, good fit between the two?) Are there short-cuts? So often an anthem will strike me as good after hearing a recording, but one verse is "not as good" (or worse) when I come to examine the score. Do you then discard it? or buy it and skip the verse? or buy it and live with it?
You have partly answered your own question. The worth of the basic materials comes first: text and tune. Are they of a quality that you want to spend time with? Do they work well together? If you like them, then go on to the setting: is it skillful? the right voicing and difficulty level for you? Does it progress easily from beginning to end? Does the coda, if any, grow out of the setting? If the answers to any of these queries, in this order, strike you as inadequate or negative, then there is no need to progress further. If you like all of a piece but one verse, you have a problem: you could either edit it or omit it, but either is apt to have unintended results. (This is editing for your use alone.) If it really seems "wrong" to you, for heaven's sake don't buy the piece! There are plenty of others! Or write a new setting of the text yourself.
2) You know so well the time periods, their styles of music and the peoples of a given era. How can we develop this knowledge for ourselves? What resources can help us? Could you offer a class giving descriptions of "typical" music of a time or location and ways to make the hymns come alive to show the style? (I realize that the above question is exactly what you did with us last weekend. I guess I'm asking for more of an outline of times and music and periods and people to apply to a date I might see on a hymn.)
I'm sure that you know more about historical styles than you realize. People apply 'music history' to their organ playing, but often don't think of applying it to hymns. . . Resources I have written are: Creative Hymn Singing (Hinshaw), which deals exactly with historical and folk styles); MELODIOUS ACCORD: Good Singing in Church (Liturgy Training Publications), which has one chapter on history and style; the video Yes! We'll Gather (Liturgy Training Publications), which shows me working with a group of singers to find the right style for many hymns; and two recent recordings with church groups for the same purpose: New Song from Old Hymns (GIA) and SING! (Congregational Song Series #3, the Association of Lutheran Church Musicians). [All these are available from the MELODIOUS ACCORD Bookstore.] But in the end, there are no rules that guarantee stylistic purity. There's almost endless variation, and the one constant to be avoided is dullness!
3) You alluded to the "gospel hymns" and some more contemporary music of today as "not good music". What makes it so? How could I as a composer and/or poet of Christian thought and music rise above the "not good" category? The people in some of these churches sing their hearts out. The melodies can linger long in my ears after attending such a service. The words can be moving (uplifting, wrenching, challenging, soothing). What makes this music "not good"? Or is it like [in] our more traditional churches, the rendition or execution of the song is lacking?
This is one of the most difficult questions! There are at least two contradictory ways of evaluating hymn texts and music. Songs that you learned as a child (or in a particularly moving more recent experience) are hallowed by memory and defy rational justification. On the other hand, if you are a professional classical poet or musician, you have all of the poetry and music that you know and love as a background for the judging of newer materials. On this scale, you can suggest that certain poems and songs hold their own in comparison with the best, and predict that they will prove of lasting worth. Fortunately both of these systems are inadequate to human experience, and all of us can often guess wrongly. Your own emotions teach you things that no one can explain: what is right for you is all right, and not to be down-sized. But I would like to suggest that in your position as the selector of music for your church, you spend some time thinking about what music you want your children to learn, and your adults to spend time on. What will stand by them in the adversities of life? Much of our 'contemporary' music is highly influenced by electronics and advertising, both of which are dedicated to this-year's-hits; is this 'disposable' music what you want to teach?
4) I was intrigued by your description of how you taught piano. I would love to sit down and have you describe this to me again. (Perhaps other instrumental teachers would like to, too.) I was never taught "how to teach music" in college, even though I have a music education degree. It frustrated me as a new music teacher at a private school when I got through college 20 years ago, and it has continued to frustrate me ever since. The "book"
method I've used has probably done more to squelch budding musicians that I care to know. Breaking through this barrier of "having" to use a book to begin teaching music is my challenge with piano students, both children and adults.
I'll have to write a longer article about this one day soon. But the basis of my teaching, then and now, is the conviction that melody - song - is what brings us into music in the first place. So base your teaching on songs which the child (or adult) already knows or learns to sing, building on that which they already love. Getting the fingers to play the tune musically (phrasing, breathing, changing dynamics, etc.) is the first order; then comes learning simple accompaniment patterns, and exploring all around the keyboard. The only book we used was a music manuscript book: either they or I wrote every note in it. They learned to 'read' by 'writing'. By Christmas time they could play the melodies of several carols well, or chord them as we switched off in duets. With the new year I would introduce a beginner's book which was found to be, of course, ridiculously simple - then I'd give a new book each lesson until we found the level they had attained.
Thank you for giving me a glimpse of this alternative method. And again, thank you! Your workshop was an answer to prayer for me.
Gratefully, Barbara Goodchild
(Shelburne, MA)